Analysis Of Dumpster Diving By Lars Eichner - 972 Words

Interpretation of Eichner Homelessness has been an increasingly difficult problem to solve within America. Though it affects many, nearly one-fourth of homeless people are veterans, most of which have served in Vietnam or have had an honorable discharge. â€Å"Dumpster Diving,† by Lars Eichner is a nonfiction short story about how society is quick to judge people based on their possessions. Eichner narrates this short story as a homeless man forced to survive by living off of the discarded materials of the people whom are more privileged than him. His tone throughout the story is sarcastic and condescending toward the educated audience he is projecting to, often lying and making fun of them. Eichner urges the audience to gain more respect for†¦show more content†¦Undefeated, Eighner makes his way to the local college where the students, particularly the sorority girls, who use meaningless material gain to increase emotional stability, similar to that of the people in the pizza shop. Despite hi s agitation he tends to linger near their housing, as what they define as trash still has value: â€Å"since it is Daddy’s money, the student decides not to take a chance†(Eichner 355). throwing out items such as peanut butter, to the narrator’s disappointment who states, â€Å"non organic peanut butter does not require refrigeration and is not likely to expire in any reasonable time.†(Eighner 355) Not only are the students unappreciative as a result of their dependence on their parents, having everything handed to them has turned them into defeatists: â€Å"students throw out canned goods and staples at the end of semesters and... they give up at college midterm† (Eighner 355). The lazy students see only particular items as valuable but have no sense of what value actually means, throwing away anything in good condition because they do not have to pay for it. Never having to struggle the students, continue their path of destruction, never being a ble to understand happiness with their distorted view of the real world. Eighner emphasises that memories last

The Separation of Church and State in America Essay

Prayer has been banished from schools and the ACLU rampages to remove â€Å"under God† from the Pledge of Allegiance. Moreover, â€Å"Separation of Church and State† is nowhere found in the Constitution or any other founding legislation. Our forefathers would never countenance the restrictions on religion exacted today. -- Bill Flax, Forbes, 2011 Church and State seem to be two words which are entirely inseparable from each other. Religion in politics and the government has been present since the federal government was first put into place. The issue of†¦show more content†¦After the Civil War, President Grant moved for the state governments, in addition to the federal government, to be kept out of the citizens religious affairs. In 1876 James G. Blaine proposed an Amendment to congress to accomplish this task, extending the religious clauses of the first amendment, and adding a prohibition of aid to parochial schools. Senator Frelinghuysen, who opposed the Blaine amendment, stated that The Blaine Amendment very properly extends the prohibition of the first amendment of the Constitution to the States. Thus the Blaine Amendment prohibits the States, for the first time, from the establishment of religion, from prohibiting its free exercise, and from making any religious test a qualification to office. Senator Eaton of Connecticut, and others with the same objections to the Blaine Amendment, felt that the Constitution prevented congressional involvement in the peoples religious lives, and that the states should be left to make their own decisions on the matter. The Blaine Amendment was proposed to the House, passed, and then defeated in the Senate. It would be proposed to congress and defeated over and ove r again for the next 50 years, but not abandoned until the Supreme Court decided that theShow MoreRelatedThe Necessary Separation of Church and State in America Essay1641 Words   |  7 PagesThe Necessary Separation of Church and State in America On January 1, 1802, Thomas Jefferson wrote a letter to the Committee of the Danbury Baptist Association in Connecticut in which he stated: â€Å"Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between Man his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole AmericanRead More Separation of Church and State in Latin America Essay7515 Words   |  31 PagesSeparation of Church and State in Latin America Throughout Latin American history, the Roman Catholic Church has played a tumultuous role, from passive soul saving to aggressive revolutionary actions. As the countries have turned toward democracy the Catholic Church has had to recognize that along with modernization comes the promotion of two democratic ideals: the separation of Church and State and the endorsement of secularization. While many countries are still working toward a separationRead More The Separation of Church and State in America Should NOT Be Absolute 949 Words   |  4 PagesReligion is the most influential factor in human society. It is the core of our existence and has become a way of life in all cultures. The impact religion has had on the United States is overwhelming. This country was founded on the principle of Christianity. Thomas Jefferson drafted the Declaration of Independence, and James Madison articulated our countries constitution with the belief that the Christian faith would establish and govern t his great society. Merriam-Websters online dictionaryRead More Keep Church and State Separated Essay1667 Words   |  7 PagesKeep Church and State Separated missing works cited America is constantly evolving and redefining itself. Those who oppose a separation between church and state claim that because this country was founded on religious principles, our government should continue to base its laws on a Judeo-Christian God. An article entitled, â€Å"Standing up for Church-State Separation in Difficult Times,† states that, â€Å"Religious Right groups are crowing and insisting that they have some sortRead MoreThe Boy Scouts Of America974 Words   |  4 Pagesof America. Effectively on 1 January 2014 ends a one hundred year old ban on allowing openly homosexuals to join the Boy Scouts of America, which is causing a lot of ruckus within the Boy Scout community. That being the case, some of the older generation Boy Scouts are resigning from the scouts and others are accepting the newer generation with open arms. Since, society is changing and accepting the homosexual race, so should the Boy Scouts of America, basing it on the separation of chu rch andRead MoreEssay on The Separation of Church and State1043 Words   |  5 PagesThe Separation of Church and State America wastes a lot of time trying to create a democracy completely absent of the moral expectations that our ancestors have put into place. Our founding fathers’ dream of establishing a country in which all people would be accepted has begun to fall. In our attempt to rid our country of a democracy contaminated with any belief in a supreme power, we have rid ourselves of many of our values and morals. Perhaps it is impossible for religion to dominate ourRead More Separation of Church and State Essay examples988 Words   |  4 PagesSeparation of Church and State America is constantly evolving and redefining itself. We have come to the point where we are less inclined to criticize individuals that are different from us and more inclined to embrace eachother’s eccentricities. Those who oppose a separation between church and state claim that because this country was founded on religious principles, our government should continue to base its laws on Christianity. An article entitled, â€Å"Standing up for Church-StateRead MoreChurch-state Relations in America1017 Words   |  4 Pages Church-state relations in America has been widely discussed and hotly debated. One school of thought holds that the church should be absolutely separated from the state, while another holds that the church plays a moral role in state building and its sanctity, without which the state risks falling apart. In my discussion of the church-state relations, I will show that the history of church-state relations has a Constitutional background. I w ill attempt to discuss the two schools of thought and howRead More A Guard on Religious Freedom Essay765 Words   |  4 PagesIn the eyes of our founding fathers, few things seemed as important as the separation of church and state. The first amendment grants all Americans the freedom to subscribe to any religion they wish and promises that the government will not promote any religion above any other. Although the separation of church and state and the freedom of religion are firmly and concretely secured in the Constitution of the United States, events in the recent past bring to question whether this ideal is under threatRead More George W. Bushs Faith Based Initiative and the Separation of Church and State Clause1326 Words   |  6 Pages Bushs Faith Based Initiative and the Separation of Church and State Clause Nowhere in the U.S constitution or any other official documents  does it say that there must be strict â€Å"separation of church and state†.   This clause was used by Jefferson in his letter to the Danbury Baptist Association of Connecticut on January 1, 1802 (Truthwalk 1).   After being revised six times by one of our founding fathers, James Madision, the first amendment now states that,   â€Å"Congress shall make no law respecting

Cultural Relativism Essay Research Paper The thesis free essay sample

Cultural Relativism Essay, Research Paper The thesis of meta-ethical cultural relativism is the philosophical point of view that there are no absolute moral truths, merely truths relation to the cultural context in which they exist. From this it is hence presumed that what one society considers to be morally right, another society may see to be morally incorrect, hence, moral right # 8217 ; s and wrongs are merely comparative to a peculiar society. Therefore cultural relativism implies that what is # 8216 ; good # 8217 ; is what is # 8217 ; socially approved # 8217 ; in a given civilization. Two statements in favor of cultural relativism are the # 8216 ; Cultural Differences statement # 8217 ; and the # 8216 ; Argument from the virtuousness of tolerance # 8217 ; , the following essay will look at and measure both of these statements. The cultural differences statement goes like this ; # 8216 ; Different civilizations have different moral codifications, therefore there is no 1 correct set of moral claims, merely those that conform to the major set of beliefs within the given civilization # 8217 ; . We will write a custom essay sample on Cultural Relativism Essay Research Paper The thesis or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page First I am traveling to look at James Rachel # 8217 ; s ( in # 8216 ; The Elementss of Moral Philosophy # 8217 ; , Ch.2 ) analysis of this statement, and secondly I would lie to give my appraisal of the statement. Rachel # 8217 ; s argues that this statement is non logical, as the decision does non follow from the factual premiss. The premiss makes an averment about differences in moral beliefs. The decision makes an averment about the nature of moral facts or truths. In general, he argues, one can non presume anything about what is or is non true about the universe, from premises about beliefs about the universe. A civilization may believe that the Earth is level, but believing so doesn # 8217 ; Ts make it so ( nor does belief that the Earth is circular make it so ) . Nor does dissension over the form of the Earth imply that there is no definite form. This unfavorable judgment is non assuming that the premiss on which the cultural differences statement is based on is false, instead that the truth of the premiss can non vouch the truth of the decision. Rachel # 8217 ; s claim that physical facts are independent of beliefs about those facts is non justified. We neer have entree to the physical universe apart from, or independent of, some scientific or conceptual model. There is no # 8220 ; position from nowhere # 8221 ; which we can utilize to find whether our opinions about the universe are true or non. Moral facts are similar. In both instances the truth or falseness of a claim can merely be evaluated against the background of some conceptual model or another. It is in this regard I believe that Rachel # 8217 ; s statement can be criticised. I would wish to add a personal unfavorable judgment to the cultural differences statement. The statement presumes that a moral action within a given society is right every bit long as the society condones the act. I believe that this given is faulted given that, as history has frequently shown us, certain societies have been forced, or manipulated into, excusing and transporting out certain Acts of the Apostless on behalf of the governments within the society. The most common illustration of this would be Hitler’s powerful influence over Germany during World War two that led the state to brutal freaks such as the Holocaust. A possible solution to this job, I believe, would be to add a simple comment to the statement ; ‘Different civilizations have different moral codifications, therefore there is no 1 set of right moral codifications, merely those that conform to the major set of beliefs within the given civilization, given that the beliefs are non forced upon the given culture’ . The statement from the virtuousness of tolerance is the following statement in favor of cultural relativism that I am traveling to look at. The statement states that: # 8216 ; meta-ethical cultural relativism promotes tolerance of different cultural moral beliefs, therefore we should accept this point of view, as it is the lone meta-ethical place that promotes tolerance of cultural differences in moral beliefs. # 8217 ; This statement lies on the premise that because it is the lone meta-ethical place that promotes tolerance one should therefore follow it. I believe that this premise is flawed in that a individual should non follow something merely because it has one favorable facet that is non offered elsewhere. Take for illustration if a scientific theory offered a solution to an unresolved job that had non been attempted before, but lay on a scientifically impossible premise, one would evidently non accept this theory in explicating the phenomenon. I believe this is the same for the statement from the virtuousness of tolerance, as one should non accept the statement merely on the virtue that it is the merely in its field to advance tolerance. The thesis of meta-ethical cultural relativism, in my position, is neither right nor incorrect, merely flawed. I believe that certain moral beliefs within different civilizations are justified due to the context in which they are in. I besides believe though, that absolute moral truths do be, and can non be judged right or incorrect because of the context in which they are in. In general I believe that a society should be in such a manner that promotes the being of that society, and exists in such a manner that is good for the well being of its members. I believe that certain civilizations can be judged right or incorrect if they act in such a manner that does non continue its being, but on the other manus I believe that we must esteem the civilizations of others even where some beliefs do non populate up to our criterions of # 8216 ; right # 8217 ; and # 8216 ; incorrect # 8217 ; . Cultural relativism is a construct for much argument, my essay has looked at two statements on the affirmatory, viz. the statement from the virtuousness of tolerance and the cultural differences statement. Although the statements are deficient to turn out cultural relativism as a cardinal philosophical truth, they do supply grounds for many people to see themselves # 8216 ; cultural relativists # 8217 ; , and therefore give the construct a great trade of virtue in meta-ethical philosophical surveies. 32d

Star Wars Vs. Star Trek Essay Paper Example For Students

Star Wars Vs. Star Trek Essay Paper I have read so many different comments in the past that highlightedthe cult following that both of these space series have, that I felt Ireally needed to cast my spin on it. Throughout the past 20 plus years, two science fiction cult classicshave tried and failed on several occasions to out do each other on the bigscreen and television series. They both have followings of loyal fans thatrival any sports team in America. You name it and both have it from lunchboxes, to t-shirts, masks, bed sheets, and oh yes, figurines!Star Wars and Star Trek share many similarities, both are sciencefiction movies but only to occasional watchers, to the dedicated fan thisis where it stops. Star Wars and Star Trek are arguably different. Theyare both stunning examples ofmodern science fiction but, are not the same. Star Trek and Star Wars eachposse different general concepts and motives. We will write a custom essay on Star Wars Vs. Star Trek Paper specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now First of all, and the most appealing, the technology of Star Trek ismore along the lines of what we would most likely see in the immediatefuture for mankind. The technology that is displayed in Star Wars is so farahead of what we can conceptualize, that it is hard to digest. We canvisualize stun guns that would fit in our hand and be the size of a cellphone but lightsabers? A highly dignified glowing sword that can slicethrough titanium doors is like nothing we can imagine! Not to mentionplanet destroying canons and a spaceship the size of our moon. The biggest difference has got to be the magical and mystical allpowerful Force. We can be conned into really anything right up until thispoint; light speed, laser cannons, radically shaped battle ships, andbattle stations, but the force thing is just too far out their. Star Trek has the more realistic approach to technology with tasersthat look like garage door openers, but can be set to stun to preserve lifeinstead of vaporizing it. The Star Trek vessels also posse shapes and formsthat we can better relate to. The main aspect of being a captain also isbeing able to beat your opponent to a pulp without the aid of technology. Han Solos only display of fist fighting was in Return of the Jedi whenhe flipped over a scout trooper as Luke and Leia sped off. Captain Kirk onthe other hand has fought many people hand-to-hand weather it was throwinga Klingon commander down a lava pit, or beating Khan to death with leadpipe. Kirk is the winner here, and you know how much we like a winner!Lets get to the real difference, Star Trek is trying to Boldly gowhere no man has gone before while Star Wars is trying to defend thegalaxy from the Dark Side. The entire realm of outer space has beenexplored and now needs defending while Star Trek is trying to spread mankinds knowledge of the universe and again goes back to the aspect of aconcept that we can better relate to for our immediate future. The final comparison has got to be the fans. The so called Trekkie isone of the most tireless nerds that you will ever meet. Most will stand ina line for 10 hours or more just to get an autograph from someone theydont even know outside of a costume. The Warsie will have anyoneassociated with Star Wars sign their arm and then go off to tattoo it andhave it immortalized and the Warsie also quotes entire movies and collectsmillions of dollars worth of memorabilia and he may even pursue the forceas a religion and learn all 7 forms of lightsaber skills using a hand madelightsaber made from a flash light and cardboard tubing.